Trump, Erickson And The GOP’s Lack Of Credibility

Election day 2016 is still fifteen months away and we have already reached the “silly season”, but then again any election cycle involving billionaire blowhard and reality television reject Donald Trump means a never ending dose of silliness.

Right now self described conservatives are slinging at each other the kind of mud that you would think they would reserve for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton and it is quite fascinating.

On Friday founder and blogger Erick Erickson announced that he had rescinded an invitation to Trump that would have allowed the GOP Presidential candidate to speak at the website’s gathering this weekend. The reason for doing so Erickson sighted, was sexist and misogynistic comments Trump made about Fox News Host Megyn Kelley, who also happened to be one of the three moderators of the first Republican debate on Thursday night.

His comment was inappropriate. It is unfortunate to have to disinvite him,” Erickson wrote. “But I just don’t want someone on stage who gets a hostile question from a lady and his first inclination is to imply it was hormonal. It just was wrong.”

Trump as is his wont responded to the disinvite by telling The Washington Post that Erickson is a “total loser” and that this whole episode is another example of America being afflicted with the sickness of “political correctness.”

Donald Trump has very few if any likable qualities about him but give him this–at least on this matter—he is not running away from his dislike of the female species, unlike the conservative commentator whose telling him “you can’t come to my party.”

On Saturday morning my Twitter feed was full of Erickson tweets that had been retweeted. All of these sexist and misogynistic comments would have been enough to earn good ol’ Eric a hearty slap on the back from the Donald himself. The other bit of irony coming from this particular story is that in Trump’s place Erickson invited the aforementioned Kelly which is strange considering that back in 2013 the pair got into a spat on live TV over Erickson’s comments about women bringing harm to their children by being the primary breadwinners in their household.

Calling Erickson a disingenuous windbag would be an insult to disingenuous windbags everywhere. He didn’t speak up in Kelly’s defense because he felt like she and women everywhere need defending, He spoke up because he and every other Republican voter knows that Donald Trump is bad for GOP business. Erickson isn’t angry over Trump’s treatment of Kelly and his blatant disrespect for women like her he is upset because Trump refused to shoot down the idea that he would run as a third party candidate should voters not make him the nominee next year.

Republicans want to win The White House every four years no matter who their Democratic opponent is. Now take into account that in 2016 they could possible lose to a woman that they absolutely despise on the heels of losing twice to a guy that they’ve called everything but n****r. And there is the fact that the women they despise is married to a former President who they called a murderer (White Water) and had impeached from the job.

Yes, Donald Trump brings a smile to a lot of faces on the right when he talks about immigration and trade but his chances of beating Hillary Clinton and winning the Presidency are slim and that’s being generous. Thus the dishonest side show being conducted by Erick Erickson.

Ladies and gentleman this, unfortunately is American democracy at work.

Follow Me on Twitter @ebrew79 and e-mail me at

Trump, Erickson And The GOP’s Lack Of Credibility

GOP Is Back Where It Doesn’t Want To Be

Never, ever underestimate the amount of egotism one has to have to undertake a Presidential run. Thinking that you, and only you are the one person who can solve the world’s problems is pretty haughty to say the least. Yet several politicians, businesspeople, and neurosurgeons are starting their engines for the 2016 race for the White House.

On Monday, South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham kind of became the latest GOP contender to toss his hat in the ring, although he was quick to point out that an official announcement won’t come until June 1st. Graham told the hosts of “CBS This Morning” that “I’m running because of what you see on television. I’m running because I think the world is falling apart.”

With Graham’s “maybe” announcement and news that both Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie are both leaning in the direction of becoming candidates The Republican Party finds itself in a familiar position, a position that it did not want to be in again.

During on a segment on MSNBC’s “All In With Chris Hayes” Monday night, Hayes, former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, and political commentator Sam Seder discussed the possibility of the party capping the number of candidates it will host at it’s first Presidential debate this August at twelve. This, despite the fact that as of right now there are fifteen legitimate contenders. This also undoes everything that current party chairman Reince Priebus tried to do to make sure that this cycle didn’t look like the last.

No matter how you view this the GOP is in a no win situation. All of these candidates will have some significant financial backing and party bigwigs would not be helping themselves with donors of candidates who find themselves on the sideline. I really don’t think that Priebus or his second in command at the RNC, Sean Spicer have the guts to alienate an important contributor like John Arnold.

If you aren’t familiar with Arnold, he is billionaire who made his money as a trader at Enron. He also is not a fan of worker’s and their pensions, that’s why he has been putting tons of dollars behind the aforementioned Christie, who coincidentally has been making the rounds lately extolling the dangers of old people collecting Social Security. I’m pretty sure that every conservative issue is important to a guy like Arnold, but the one that takes precedent is retirement funds and how they should be distributed. If Christie is not on the stage in the first or any of the Republican debates to argue for his cause Arnold may take his billions and go home rather than contribute mightily to the eventual Republican nominee.

There is also the question of optics. Republicans, and Preibus in particular have always reacted angrily when being casted as the party of rich, middle aged, straight white men. Can they in 2016 really afford to have Ben Carson, Bobby Jindal, and Carly Fiorina excluded from the debate stage when the prime time lights come on?

Now granted all three of these individuals are terrible candidates, Fiorina’s business record is a mess and not the example of leadership that the nation needs. Carson is a brilliant doctor who doesn’t have much going for him from a political standpoint, he also recently had his Herman Cain “I’ve got all of this stuff twirling around in my head moment” when he couldn’t significantly explain his tax plan to Fox News’ Chris Wallace. Jindal has been an unmitigated disaster in terms of his stewardship of Louisiana, to say that he would be far down on the GOP pecking order would be an understatement to say the least.

Even though we are talking about Republican world where racism and sexism is a thing of the past how can those three contenders be on the outside looking in when ones that are just as flawed have first class seats? And how would the party defend itself from charges that it is exclusive on race and gender, and is stuck in the past?

What is not currently being said but what a lot of people behind the scenes know is that the GOP is going to have to adopt the attitude of “the more the merrier.” Because of Citizens United’s influence on the current political landscape and the party’s dreadful record on race over the last fifty years Preibus and his colleagues know that exclusion is not an option. That is great for the public simply from an entertainment standpoint—the 2012 debates gave us some laugh out loud moments that were classic– even if it’s bad for politicians who are trying to prove that they’ve got something to offer other than “We’re not the Democrats.”

GOP Is Back Where It Doesn’t Want To Be

Recent News On Ferguson and St. Louis

Recent News On Ferguson. Great Writing By Black Butterfly 7.

We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident

Federal Probe Into St. Louis Police Department

St. Louis CBS Local News reports that as many as 25 St. Louis City police officers are under investigation for being hired to protect drug dealers. St. Louis Police Chief Sam Dotson says the involved officers are no longer on active duty as the investigation continues.

The Drug Enforcement Agency, FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Circuit Attorney are all involved in the investigation that began in December. The investigation began when an off-duty police officer was shot in North St. Louis. The off-duty officer returned fire and the man he shot later turned up dead in a burning car.

In a press release by the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, they state that they are unable to discuss details or findings before the investigation has concluded.


Ferguson Municipal Judge Resigns

View original post 351 more words

Recent News On Ferguson and St. Louis

What Should Happen To Brian Williams

We now live in the world of the “Hot Take.”


A hot take is defined in the urban dictionary as “an opinion that is based in simplistic moralizing rather than actual thought.” We have certainly seen this in our culture in the age of social media, the latest example being the National Football League’s “Deflate-gate” controversy involving the now Super Bowl Champion New England Patriots. Two weeks ago there were respected journalists who reside both inside and out of the sports world who were suggesting that Bill Belichick be banned from coaching football for life and that Tom Brady’s place as one of the great quarterback’s of all-time was now invalid. All of that was and is ridiculous.


It hasn’t been twenty four hours since NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams admitted that he and his film crew were not on a helicopter that was shot down by ground fire during the Iraq War in 2003. Williams had said the opposite on numerous occasions in the past, he even detailed his version of the events on an episode of “The Late Show with David Letterman” in 2013. But on January 30th when Nightly News posted a video online of Williams once again saying that he had been fired on a commenter who had been apart of the military flight crew twelve years ago spoke up and said “no.”


I now find myself in a weird gray area as it relates to Williams. I’m resisting the temptation of calling for the guy’s job by not offering up some ridiculous hot take that calls for the guy’s job. One mistake even if it is a huge one probably shouldn’t ruin years and years of hard work and dedication to a craft that he is really good at.


That said this wasn’t Williams simply forgetting to let down the toilet seat This was a slap in the face to a lot of important people. Let me be clear I have never done one day of military service in my life, but one of the things that I have always heard from men and women who are enlisted is that they have a deep disdain for non-combatants who glamorize war. That is essentially what Williams has done and it is completely understandable that people in uniform would bristle at a news anchor who recounts a war story that never happened to a late night talk show host for laughs.


The head honchos at NBC now have a decision to make about the most important news voice on their roster. The American public doesn’t like to be lied to and it doesn’t matter if the people who are doing the lying are politicians, celebrities, and yes media members. If Brian Williams hasn’t completely lost all of his credibility as a journalist, he is running very low on it at this point.

And while I won’t be the hot take guy and say he has to be replaced, his bosses might have to consider it, even if they don’t want to.

What Should Happen To Brian Williams

The Season Is Over And The NFL’s Problems Begin Again.

The National Football League got the ending to the season from hell that it so desperately wanted Sunday Night.


The New England Patriots and The Seattle Seahawks gave fans one of if not the greatest Super Bowl ever, one that was full of great players making great plays and coaches making the most boneheaded of decisions,–How hard is it to hand the football to Marshawn Lynch Pete Carroll?– In its hour of need the game of football couldn’t have had a better advertisement.


The problem for Commissioner Roger Goodell and the 32 fat cat owners that run the billion dollar enterprise is that their honeymoon period is now over and the same people who enjoyed every second Super Bowl XLIX will now return to skeptically observing a league that doesn’t really care about the physical and mental condition of its players and the crimes that some of them commit away from the field.


Ray Rice’s ghost still hangs over the league no matter how much the people in the Park Avenue offices try to erase his memory. While domestic violence is a societal problem that has been horribly dealt with by law enforcement officials and elected politicians, the NFL likes to pride itself on taking the lead on issues. In the case of spousal abuse and their players, men who are huge in physical stature the league has been positioned in the rear for quite sometime.


No one with a functioning brain will or should believe Goodell when he says the league is now on top of this problem in some part because during his annual “State of The League” address last Friday he uttered the phrase ‘domestic violence’ once. As Diana Moskovitz at Deadspin points out the league has been more about improving their image from a PR standpoint than it has been about doing the actual grunt work of dealing with the violence that is directed towards the intimate partners of its players.


There is also the issue of concussions which still looms large. In that same “State of the League” address on Friday Goodell opened by stating that diagnosed concussions of players were down 25% in 2014 and he announced the appointment of a chief medical officer that will oversee medical-related policies. The 25% number is subjective though, players have become really good at hiding the symptoms of a serious head injury from medical personnel out of fear of losing their jobs. No sport is colder when it comes to cutting ties with members of its labor force than the NFL. Bodies are tossed onto the scrap heap every day and every day new ones are welcomed into the process. That said the league should take this issue completely out of the hands of players for their own good. The minute that a player receives a jarring hit that leaves him disoriented he should be forced to leave that particular game immediately and not return, there should be no need for an in game concussion test.


I am certainly not a medical doctor and if I was it would be difficult for me to diagnose a football player with a concussion while watching a game from my couch, but there was moment in Super Bowl XLIX where Patriot wide receiver Julian Edelman, the man who caught the game winning touchdown pass was on the receiving end of a vicious hit from Seahawks safety Kam Chancellor and although Edelman got up on shaky legs and barely made it back to his team’s huddle he was able to stay in the game because none of the grownups on the field–coaches and officials–thought that he was hurt badly enough to come out. This is the kind of thing that needs to be cleaned up in this new NFL that Roger Goodell wants us believe in.


In the end a CEO that makes over $40 million a year is paid that salary to do exactly one thing, keep the cash registers ringing. The ratings for the Super Bowl were no doubt huge, NFL merchandising sales are through the roof, and the league’s television partners will be more than happy to shell out another $1 billion each when it’s time negotiate a new broadcast deal. The sausage making process may be disgusting, but we as a public still take home the product and gobble it up. As long as that is the case NFL personnel will continue to abuse their spouses, continue to suffer serious head injuries that will alter their quality of life, and their boss will continue to dodge tough questions and completely disrespect and dismiss female reporters when he can’t. This is our national pastime, warts and all.

The Season Is Over And The NFL’s Problems Begin Again.

It’s 2012 All Over Again

The events that took place in Iowa over the weekend left me wondering if it’s 2012 all over again.


Potential candidates for the Republican presidential nomination flocked to the party that was thrown by Iowa Congressman Steve King in effort to prove that they have what it takes to defeat Hillary Clinton in a head to head matchup that is still twenty-two months away.


There is former Arkansas Governor and now noted author Mike Huckabee who warned the partisan crowd that the threat of ISIL is one that they should take seriously, as if the terrorist group will be at the the shores of the United States eastern seaboard tomorrow. This was the cherry on top of the conservative values sundae for Huckabee who has been calling African-American musical mogul Shawn Carter a pimp and his wife Beyonce Knowles–quite possibly the most famous woman in the world–a prostitute. There was New Jersey Governor Chris Christie who was there to seemingly out pro-life all of the other possible contenders “Political consultants told me that there was no way I would be elected governor of New Jersey as a pro-life Republican because it had never been done, they were wrong. I can assure you being pro-life is not a political liability.” Christie speaks like a man who is unaware that 7 out of ten Americans believe in abortion rights for women, also if being pro-life isn’t a political liability, ethical questions about bridges and tax giveaways to the wealthy just might be. There was also former Texas Governor Rick Perry whose disdain for Latinos is only slightly less than the event’s host. Quite possibly the best part of the weekend was when Perry’s speech was interrupted by a group of protesters over his opposition to President Obama’s executive actions on immigration.


The most glaring example of the GOP’s unsuccessful history repeating itself was the absence of any real moderate Republicans. Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush who has in the past talked about the party’s need to reach out to Latinos and embrace comprehensive immigration reform was not extended an invitation, neither was the party’s standard bearer from two years ago former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney who has recently made waves by dropping hints of a possible third run for office, one that could be accompanied this time with a populist message.


As someone whose political ideology doesn’t line up with conservatives I must say that I’m pleased that their party leaders haven’t figured out this one thing. Going further to the right politically will not win back the White House. Huckabee, Christie, Perry, and even possible second tier candidates like Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, and Ted Cruz will not get elected on a platform of more guns and less financial regulation, a platform of anti-choice measures and the repeal of the health care law.


They have been there, they have done that. In 2012 it was the fringe that forced Mitt Romney to disown his successful Massachusetts health care law Romneycare because the black dude that occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue used it as a model for the national plan. Rather than standing up for himself and saying that he helped a lot of his constituents good ol’ Mitt had to go through this ridiculous charade of telling everyone that the two laws were drastically different. Fox News and conservative talk radio would have none of it. Should Jeb Bush officially throw his hat in the ring he will find that the same people who wanted no part of Romney will  steer clear of him as if he has the plague. It’s not just the immigration issue that hangs around Bush’s neck like an albatross, he will have to defend his support of the Common Core education standards,–which enrages the GOP base as much as any issue does–and his last name due to his brother’s inability to control government spending from ‘01 to ‘09.


I’m not into doing to political favors for the Republican party but if conservative voters were to ever listen to me I would tell them to open their minds and think outside of the box when it comes to picking their next nominee. The political process in America works in a way where instead of getting the whole cake you have to settle for some of it’s crumbs. Progressives can attest to that living through the Obama years and will continue to do so if and when the Hillary era begins. Conservatives have to ask themselves if a small bite is worth having.

It’s 2012 All Over Again

Bill de Blasio Vs. The System

“Chirlane and I have had to talk to Dante for years, about the dangers he may face. A good young man, a law abiding young man, who would never think to do anything wrong, and yet, because of a history that still hangs over us, the dangers he may face–we’ve had to literally train him, as families have all over this city for decades in how to take special care in any encounter he has with the police officers who are there to protect him.”


Those don’t sound like inflammatory words from an elected official who is looking for votes, they sound like the words of a terrified father who knows that his biracial child is less likely to receive the benefit of the doubt from law enforcement because of who he is.


Bill de Blasio isn’t making anything up, he isn’t imagining something that isn’t there. He knows the statistics by heart because he has too. He knows that black male teens are twenty one times more likely to be killed by police officers than their white counterparts. He has seen the individual names and families that have personalized this American epidemic, names like John Crawford, Tamir Rice, and Aiyana Stanley Jones.


And yet at the start of this week after Christmas Bill de Blasio is being characterized as anti-cop, anti-law enforcement. A sizeable portion of New York City’s finest chose to make their feelings about the mayor known to the world when they literally turned their back to him as he spoke at the funeral of Officer Rafael Ramos on Saturday. Ramos and his partner Officer Wenjian Liu were murdered while on duty on December 13th. They were shot dead by a deranged man who shot and critically wounded his ex-girlfriend in Baltimore Maryland earlier that morning.


A day that should have been used to celebrate a fallen officer’s life was turned into a day of self promotion and self congratulation when several cops publicly and repulsively gave their boss the middle finger. So much for that moratorium on protests.


If Pat Lynch and all of the other members of the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association were injected with truth serum they would admit that Bill de Blasio is anything but anti-police, and his record proves it. It was de Blasio who hired Bill Bratton to be his police commissioner, Bratton the father of the “broken windows” theory of policing is a Rudy Giuliani disciple and has had no problems endorsing the kind of law enforcement that makes unnecessary encounters between cops and citizens much more frequent. Connecting the dots between “broken windows” and the choking death of Eric Garner at the hands of police in Staten Island would be easy to do, it would also be accurate. Would Garner be alive today if he were not being accused of selling untaxed cigarettes, more than likely. Surely that thought has had to crossed the mind of the Mayor on numerous occasions, but rather than firing Bratton and dumping a horrible policing practice de Blasio has staunchly defended his commissioner especially when talking to the constituency that voted for him in large part because of horrible policing practices.


But Pat Lynch and company aren’t really interested in the truth as much as they are interested in never being questioned by anyone over anything. I will say it again for what seems like the one millionth time, yes police officers have a very difficult very dangerous job, the reality of that danger was driven home with the deaths of Officers Ramos and Liu. But those factors don’t mean that law enforcement should be above reproach. That is the way of thinking that leads to Tamir Rice being murdered in Cleveland by an undisciplined and unstable man like Timothy Loehmann, who should never have been a police officer in the first place. It’s that way of thinking that makes it possible for Officer Peter Liang to text his union representative before dialing 911 for the man that he shot and killed in Brooklyn one month ago, an unarmed man named Akai Gurley.


As far as some cops in New York are concerned it is that line that Bill de Blasio has crossed. For the past two decades the worst elements of the NYPD rested on the fact that Giuliani and his successor Michael Bloomberg had their backs no matter how harmful and how unfair their day to day behavior was. Giuliani publicly smeared the character of a dead man in Patrick Dorismond after he was killed by NYPD in 2000. He did everything but literally spit in the face of the family of Amadou Diallo after he was murdered by New York City cops in 1999. And when he was done Giuliani tossed his policing playbook to Bloomberg who, along with his commissioner Ray Kelly, made the phrase “Stop and Frisk” a household name.


The current mayor of New York City certainly wants to keep it’s residents safe from criminals it’s just that he also wants to keep it’s black and brown residents safe from the law, and at the end of the day that’s the way it should be. As David A. Love wrote in The “The execution-style shooting of two NYPD officers in Brooklyn was a cold-blooded, senseless murder and we must call it what is, but we have to be able to condemn police brutality as we condemn the killings of police officers, the two are not mutually exclusive.” While those words ring true for so many people across the country they apparently ring hollow for just as many, starting with members of the law.

Bill de Blasio Vs. The System